GN Law - Our People News and TV

Is it time for reform of civil partnerships?

Our People - Claudette Terrode
7 December, 2018

When same sex marriage was introduced in 2013, Parliament decided not to abolish Civil Partnerships for same sex couples or to extend Civil Partnerships for opposite sex couples despite the fact that this would bring about inequality.

Rebecca Steinfield and Charles Keiden challenged this position. They wanted full legal recognition of their relationship but they did not wish to marry because of their personal objections to the institution of marriage.

The couple, who have two young daughters, claimed that the Governments position on Civil Partnerships (same sex couples only) is incompatible with equality law. They took their case to the Court of Appeal but it was defeated in 2018.  They were given permission to appeal to the Supreme Court, which is the UK’s highest Court, and their appeal was unanimously allowed.

Throughout the couples’ campaign they met hundreds of other couples who are in a committed, loving relationships but who do not wish to marry for a variety of reasons. To name but a few; past bad experiences; personal views on marriage as well as religious views. In the case of Rebecca Steinfield and Charles Keiden, they held deep rooted and ideological objections to marriage. In their words, marriage held “patriarchal baggage”.  This view made marriage incompatible with their conscience.

Campaigners argued that it cannot be fair that same sex couples have two options, Civil Partnership and civil marriage whereas opposite sex couples only have the option of marriage.

It is estimated that over three million couples in the UK cohabit with little or no protection in the event of separation.  A change in the law would lead to many entering into Civil Partnerships as it provides the same legal protection to couples who are married but without what some see as the religious and patriarchal connotations associated with marriage.

The Supreme Court has acknowledged that Civil Partnerships need to be reformed as the current law is incompatible with Article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

It waits to be seen how the Government will respond but it is hoped that this result puts pressure on the Government to reform the law on Civil Partnerships.

Related Articles

Two commonly used tools for couples to set out their rights, responsibilities, and financial plans are Cohabitation Agreements and Prenuptial Agreements. But how do they differ?
Our People - Loretta Orsi-Barzanti
The prospect of getting a divorce can be overwhelming, especially when attempting to understand the divorce procedure, related costs and timescales.
Our People - Loretta Orsi-Barzanti
A pre-proceedings meeting, or legal gateway meeting, means that the Local Authority is concerned about the care of your children and is considering taking the matter to Court.
Our People - Jalpa Vadgama
Receiving a pre-proceedings letter from Social Services can be a concerning and pivotal moment for families. The PLO letter indicates that the Local Authority is troubled about the welfare of your children and is contemplating court involvement.
Our People - Jalpa Vadgama
The term "Divorce Day" has gained traction, labelling the first Monday in January as a peak in divorce applications. But does this title accurately capture the surge in New Year divorce filings or merely serve as a journalistic trope?
Our People - Kathleen Bennet
Looking at the latest trends in divorce rates which increased in recent published data. Also what are the changes in divorce rates on 10 and 25 year marriages?
Our People - Kathleen Bennet

Send a message

We will only use the information you enter in this form to contact you about your enquiry and will not share it with anyone else. Please read our Privacy Notice.

Please note that we are not accepting any new housing work at this time.