GN Law - Our People News and TV

Mother loses Judicial Review of care package for disabled son

Our People - Maria Nicholas
28 August, 2013

A mother fighting as litigation friend on behalf of her 17 year old disabled son has recently lost a judicial review claim in the High Court against Worcestershire County Council.

The claim sought to overturn the Council’s policy to impose a maximum spend on providing care to disabled individuals in their own home. The maximum spend cap is proposed to be set at “no more than the net weekly cost… of a care home placement that could be commissioned to meet the individual’s assessed eligible needs”.

The effect of such a cap on spending means that for this particular young man and others like him, residential care may become the only viable option.

Mr Justice Hickinbottom said that nobody should be forced into living in residential care, but the reality is that if appropriate care will not be provided to someone in their own home, they may be left with no other realistic option but to go into residential care. 

The outcome of this case may mean that other local authorities will also now seek to implement a similar policy.

It should be noted that in this case the Council argued that the young man in question may never be subject to the policy because, they argued, his needs were not so high as to warrant a level of care that would be as expensive as a residential care package. The young man’s position, advanced by his litigation friend his mother, was that he would need 24 hour care although she did not have professional evidence to substantiate this. Although this did not in the end play a big part in the final decision, it may be an important point to bear in mind if you are bringing a similar case.

The other important point is that this claim was based on procedural grounds, i.e. the claim was challenging the procedure the Council followed in preparing this policy but not the substance of the policy. The claim ultimately failed because the Court did not find that the Council had done anything wrong procedurally.

These two points are important because it may be possible in a different set of circumstances and based on different grounds to challenge a similar policy brought in by another local authority.

Related Articles

Recently, the Supreme Court has given a judgment regarding ‘ordinary residence’ and the circumstances in which someone is discharged from detention in hospital.
Our People - GN
People visiting care homes in England will have to pay for Covid-19 Lateral Flow Tests from April 2022, the Government has said.
Our People - GN
Allowing visitors into care homes is crucial for maintaining the quality of life of residents and also allowing family and friends to maintain contact with their loved ones.
Our People - GN
Cerise White takes a look at the law surrounding family visiting loved ones in care homes during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Our People - Cerise White
Lilian Efstathiou looks at the consequences of Covid-19 on the Mental Capacity Act 2005.
Our People - Lilian Efstathiou
Lillian Efstathiou takes a look at the position on visiting loved ones in care homes during the current lockdown.
Our People - Lilian Efstathiou

Send a message

We will only use the information you enter in this form to contact you about your enquiry and will not share it with anyone else. Please read our Privacy Notice.

Please note that we are not accepting any new housing work at this time.