GN Law - Our People News and TV

To report or not to report….

Our People - GN
Sania Dar
9 October, 2015

The media have been attending the family court since 2009 in a bid to encourage openness. There are restrictions when reporting cases involving children as their identities must be protected, save in exceptional circumstances. However, with divorce and financial remedies cases, media reporting is allowed unless the judge imposes restrictions.

Since media reporting has been allowed in the family court there has been tension between the benefits of public scrutiny and legitimate expectations of privacy and confidentiality. Lack of guidance for the Judiciary and an ongoing division in the Judiciary on what can and cannot be reported, is leading to an inconsistent approach.

The Judiciary’s approach to media reporting is on a case by case basis. Some members of the Judiciary prefer an open court with no restrictions whereas others prefer a semi-restrictive approach to media reporting.

Mr Justice Mostyn takes a cautious approach which is highlighted in his most recent judgement in DL v SL. Mr Justice Mostyn ordered in this ‘unremarkable’ financial remedies case that the media should not publish any report of the case that identified any person involved (except the lawyers) or the any financial information, unless it was already in the public domain. He further commented:

“It is my opinion that the law concerning the presence of the media in these private proceedings … is to enable the press to be the eyes and ears of the public so as to ensure that the case is conducted fairly and to enable the public to be educated in an abstract and general way about the processes that are deployed, but does not extend to breaching the privacy of the parties in these proceedings that Parliament has given to them.”

In contrast, Mr Justice Holman prefers an open court, no media reporting restrictions approach, as is highlighted in the recent case of Fields v Fields [2015] EWHC 1670 (Fam). This is in a bid to encourage openness in family courts, which appears to be a greater public interest than the individual’s right to privacy.

Mr Justice Holman’s approach, while open and transparent, may discourage parties from seeking the assistance of the court, so as to avoid having their ‘dirty linen washed in public’. This is worrying, as it may result in parties seeking alternatives to court, which could result in an unequal financial remedy for one party and an unfair outcome. While everyone has the right to privacy it comes at a high price if it is protected at the expense of their right to access justice.  

Perhaps a sensible approach would be a middle ground between Mr Justice Mostyn and Mr Justice Holman – encourage the media to report on the law, procedure and the financial remedy, but protect the identity of the parties involved.

Such an approach may deter tabloids hunting for a ‘scoop’ in celebrity divorces. Fuelling such stories is not the purpose of open justice.

But until the courts and Judiciary agree and apply a uniform approach how can openness be achieved? There needs to be a wider discussion within the Judiciary and uniformity of approach and until then parties face the risk of media involvement in their private affairs

Related Articles

Two commonly used tools for couples to set out their rights, responsibilities, and financial plans are Cohabitation Agreements and Prenuptial Agreements. But how do they differ?
Our People - Loretta Orsi-Barzanti
The prospect of getting a divorce can be overwhelming, especially when attempting to understand the divorce procedure, related costs and timescales.
Our People - Loretta Orsi-Barzanti
A pre-proceedings meeting, or legal gateway meeting, means that the Local Authority is concerned about the care of your children and is considering taking the matter to Court.
Our People - Jalpa Vadgama
Receiving a pre-proceedings letter from Social Services can be a concerning and pivotal moment for families. The PLO letter indicates that the Local Authority is troubled about the welfare of your children and is contemplating court involvement.
Our People - Jalpa Vadgama
The term "Divorce Day" has gained traction, labelling the first Monday in January as a peak in divorce applications. But does this title accurately capture the surge in New Year divorce filings or merely serve as a journalistic trope?
Our People - Kathleen Bennet
Looking at the latest trends in divorce rates which increased in recent published data. Also what are the changes in divorce rates on 10 and 25 year marriages?
Our People - Kathleen Bennet

Send a message

We will only use the information you enter in this form to contact you about your enquiry and will not share it with anyone else. Please read our Privacy Notice.

Please note that we are not accepting any new housing work at this time.