Transparency in the Court of Protection?

Emma Bergin
6 October 2017

Court of Protection hearings had been criticized for being secretive, as a result the ‘Transparency Pilot’ began in January 2016.It was only due to last 6 months, but has been extended. Cases under the pilot scheme are open to the public – a reversal of the default position. A transparency order is made which usually continues throughout the proceedings. The aim was to introduce the procedure across all cases before the end of 2016 but, instead, the pilot has been extended.

The order can ensure the client is protected, reducing a need for worry. An injunction will normally be issued with the order prohibiting certain details of the case from being disclosed. Upon attending a hearing, anyone who is not party to the proceedings (e.g. press) must sign a document recording their attendance and acknowledging the terms of the order. As a result, publication of identifying details is forbidden. There can be cases where a hearing in public will not be appropriate and the judge can decide that the pilot should not apply to such cases.

The few attendees to such hearings are likely to be friends and family, or sometimes journalists. A short descriptor of the case will be included in the anonymised court listing for journalists to decide if they believe the case may be of public interest. However, the brevity means the attention of journalists often will not be drawn to the case. Therefore, the complaints that prompted the pilot have rarely come to pass and cases of public interest will not be reported on in the media. Arguably, it would be helpful to the media to have more detailed descriptions of cases before hearings take place. The involvement of the media does have its pros and cons, especially as issues raised in CoP cases be very emotive and divide opinion. Managed correctly and with responsible journalism that does not sensationalise cases, the transparency pilot can mean important issues are raised.

Currently, most cases are subject to the pilot and as it has been running relatively smoothly when parliament gives time to the issue, it is likely to be implemented fully across all cases. The pilot is now due to end on 30 November 2017 and revisions to the CoP rules and Practice Directions should follow.

Related Articles

GN-Symbol.png
Are Court of Protection proceedings truly public? Following the Re Gardner [2026] ruling, we explore the delicate balance between open justice and protecting the highly sensitive, private information of vulnerable individuals.
Our People - Maria Nicholas
The Supreme Court’s landmark AGNI judgment has fundamentally redefined what constitutes a deprivation of liberty in law. By replacing the Cheshire West ‘acid test’ with a new multi-factorial approach, this ruling changes the landscape of DoLS.
Our People - Owen Sugden
Administering a trust requires unanimous decision-making, sound judgment, and strict adherence to legal duties. But what happens when an appointed trustee loses the mental capacity to fulfil their role?
Our People - Burcin Kartal
In Hillingdon v YD, the Court of Protection upheld CANH for a patient with a prolonged disorder of consciousness, finding that his spiritual convictions and close family testimony carried decisive weight in determining his best interests.
GN-Symbol.png
When someone loses capacity without an LPA, a financial deputyship becomes essential. This guide explains when Court of Protection deputyships are needed, how to apply, typical costs and timelines, and your responsibilities as deputy.
Our People - Chryso Loizides
A clear, practical guide to selling property as a deputy or attorney, covering legal duties, court requirements, and step-by-step advice – essential for anyone managing a sale on behalf of someone who lacks mental capacity.

Send a message

We will only use the information you enter in this form to contact you about your enquiry and will not share it with anyone else. Please read our Privacy Notice.

Please note that we are not accepting any new housing work at this time.

If you know this information, please advise...