GN Law - Our People News and TV

Transparency in the Court of Protection?

Our People - GN
Emma Bergin
6 October, 2017

Court of Protection hearings had been criticized for being secretive, as a result the ‘Transparency Pilot’ began in January 2016.It was only due to last 6 months, but has been extended. Cases under the pilot scheme are open to the public – a reversal of the default position. A transparency order is made which usually continues throughout the proceedings. The aim was to introduce the procedure across all cases before the end of 2016 but, instead, the pilot has been extended.

The order can ensure the client is protected, reducing a need for worry. An injunction will normally be issued with the order prohibiting certain details of the case from being disclosed. Upon attending a hearing, anyone who is not party to the proceedings (e.g. press) must sign a document recording their attendance and acknowledging the terms of the order. As a result, publication of identifying details is forbidden. There can be cases where a hearing in public will not be appropriate and the judge can decide that the pilot should not apply to such cases.

The few attendees to such hearings are likely to be friends and family, or sometimes journalists. A short descriptor of the case will be included in the anonymised court listing for journalists to decide if they believe the case may be of public interest. However, the brevity means the attention of journalists often will not be drawn to the case. Therefore, the complaints that prompted the pilot have rarely come to pass and cases of public interest will not be reported on in the media. Arguably, it would be helpful to the media to have more detailed descriptions of cases before hearings take place. The involvement of the media does have its pros and cons, especially as issues raised in CoP cases be very emotive and divide opinion. Managed correctly and with responsible journalism that does not sensationalise cases, the transparency pilot can mean important issues are raised.

Currently, most cases are subject to the pilot and as it has been running relatively smoothly when parliament gives time to the issue, it is likely to be implemented fully across all cases. The pilot is now due to end on 30 November 2017 and revisions to the CoP rules and Practice Directions should follow.

Related Articles

The Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS), an integral part of the Mental Capacity Act 2005, are crucial provisions designed to protect individuals who lack the mental capacity to make specific decisions about their well-being.
Our People - Maria Nicholas
The Office of the Public Guardian (OPG) released legal guidance tailored to professional deputies and attorneys concerning the rules governing gift-giving. This article highlights some of the key issues outlined in that guidance.
Our People - Navin Bundhoo
Recently, the Supreme Court has given a judgment regarding ‘ordinary residence’ and the circumstances in which someone is discharged from detention in hospital.
Our People - GN
When circumstances leave individuals unable to handle their own financial affairs, there are legal mechanisms available to protect their financial stability, such as Deputyship and LPAs. 
Our People - Lilian Efstathiou
The Court of Protection in the UK has the power to grant injunctions. But what is an injunction, and how does it relate to the Court of Protection?
Our People - Olivia Allen
A Standard Authorisation is used to lawfully deprive someone of their liberty in order to care for them. Can you challenge this? Is legal aid available?
Our People - Olivia Allen

Send a message

We will only use the information you enter in this form to contact you about your enquiry and will not share it with anyone else. Please read our Privacy Notice.

Please note that we are not accepting any new housing work at this time.