GN Law - Our People News and TV

Trick or tweet?

Our People - Luke Cowles
26 June, 2014

A BBC article on 24 June 2014 states a senior officer has told them that social media crime makes up “at least half” of a front-line police officer’s work. In addition to this, 6,000 officers were being trained to deal with online offences.

The recent case like Paul Chambers demonstrates some of the issues. Mr Chambers was initially convicted by a Crown Court for his ‘joke’ tweet about blowing up Robin Hood airport in South Yorkshire. This conviction was then quashed after a successful challenge. While his case might seem ludicrous, it’s a warning to everyone. Online impulsivity can have serious consequences.

So what about private messages to an individual? A post on someone’s wall? The police are spending unprecedented proportions of their time weeding out what is just an ‘online disagreement’, and what is something more such as an ‘insult’ or ‘threat’.

It’s important to remember a threat may be a criminal offence. The medium used to threaten is not relevant. The police are encouraging people to use their own initiatives to be safe online. “Common sense” they implore extends to “un-friending” someone on facebook, or reporting the issue to facebook in the first instance.

The College of Policing are drawing together research to quantify how many crimes originate on social media. The results are due over the coming months and I will report on them in our news feed in due course. For now, remember that everything you type on the internet is there for all to see, including a judge …

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Head of Claims Against Public Authorities Department
Luke Cowles is an Associate Solicitor who works predominantly in the actions against police team but also assists in the mental health team. He advises both clients who are eligible to receive legal aid as well as private clients.

Related Articles

This article will explore a victim’s rights when disagreeing with a decision made by the police or Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) not to prosecute a suspect. The police have investigatory powers and present their evidence to the CPS. The CPS are a body that determines whether there is a suitable amount of evidence to persuade...
Our People - Ayana Porteous Simpson
Emma Bergin provides a useful summary of the operation of Schedule 22 to the Coronavirus Act 2020.
Our People - GN
Emma Bergin takes us through the police powers as set out in Schedule 21 of the Coronavirus Act 2020.
Our People - GN
GN Law

Send a message

We will only use the information you enter in this form to contact you about your enquiry and will not share it with anyone else. Please read our Privacy Notice.